Designed For Power Not To Rule

As the blood continues to ooze from under the door of Mayor Ford’s office at City Hall, bloodtheshingand the already small circle gets even smaller, it’s still difficult to get your head around the notion of a post-Ford Toronto. All those trees being on fire makes it really hard to see the forest. One can hope and one can dream but visualizing it takes a lot of effort.

There’s no telling how this latest… I don’t have the necessary vocabulary to describe the state of mayoral politics in Toronto at the moment… something something … will play out. An early exit? Certainly not by his own volition, it seems. Stay the course! Everything’s fine! First name on the ballot in the next election!

Removal by ‘external forces’, let’s call them. Your guess is as good as mine. They would have to be extraordinary circumstances, even by these already extraordinary circumstances, to turf the mayor before the next scheduled election. Around these parts mayors appear to be immoveable objects once installed into office.

Thing is, though, time marches on regardless of Mayor Ford’s status. The business of the city is being tended to whether he thinks he’s at the helm or not. handofgodTry and look away from the ongoing political wreckage and focus on the bigger picture. Stop squirming while the international audience looks on at us in wide eyed amazement. We all saw that coming, didn’t we? It’s only surprising it took this long.

One way or the other, this will pass. We must be ready to move on. In preparation, it’s good to remind ourselves of two important points that were brought up earlier this week.

Matt Elliott’s Challenge Accepted and Edward Keenan’s The trouble with Dougie’s people taking over. If you haven’t already read them yet, do it right now. I can wait. In fact, I’ll just switch over to my Twitter feed and see if the mayor’s staff has shrunk any further.

Go ahead. We’ll meet back here when you’re done.

wait

 

OK. First, Mr. Elliott.

“False. Absolutely, definitely false.”

We’ve seen it happening already. What’s left of this administration is trying to shrug off accusations about alleged personal failings by pumping up its governance cred. We said we’d stop the gravy train, and we have. We’ve kept your taxes low. We’ve cut wasteful spending. We’ve turned this fiscal ship of state around in the right direction.

Forgive us our trespasses, folks. But we’ve rocked our campaign promises. pickanumber1Boo-yeah!

“False. Absolutely, definitely false.”

They make up magic numbers. They claim credit for things they really had no hand in. What little policy initiatives they have managed to implement don’t amount to much more than a hill of beans in the scheme of things and have only truly accomplished making things just a little bit worse around the city. Fewer buses running more infrequently and more crowded. Park grass cut and streets cleaned a little less often. Smaller selection of books to borrow from the libraries.

And with no noticeable savings of tax dollars in our pockets. As Mr. Elliott shows, despite flatlining our gross operating budget, our property taxes have still gone up. So have user fees like transit fares. We’re paying more than we did in 2010 but are getting less.

Pretty much the exact opposite of Team Ford’s primary campaign pledge.

Pretty much the exact opposite of what any politician who steps into the fray and attempts to champion those very policy ideas and sideline the mayor. Beware any candidate trying to convince you that the message was sound. It was just delivered by the wrong messenger. pinocchio1The direction city council took early on in this term was misguided, no matter who was leading it.

“Confront. Attack. Repeat.”

This is the second point I want to make, cherry-picked from Edward Keenan’s post in The Grid on Wednesday.

The Ford Administration doesn’t have a leg to stand on at this point. Its very legitimacy is being questioned, and not just by the usual suspects who’ve been skeptical of it from the outset. Once obedient councillors are outspoken in their criticism. James Pasternak. John Parker. Jaye Robinson. The loyalist of the loyal simply keep their heads low.

Staff are jumping ship at a dizzying rate. Two yesterday. Five since the crack allegations surfaced. Some now sit on the sidelines, playfully sniping at the administration they once dutifully served.

How does the mayor and his dwindling number of defenders react?

“Confront. Attack. Repeat.”

inyourfaceI might add Deny to that list of Mr. Keenan’s. Deny. Confront. Attack. Repeat.

It goes something like this:

None of this situation – if there was a situation and there’s definitely not a situation – is our fault. It’s all just lies and rumours spread by our enemies. Enemies like the Toronto Star and all the social elite subscribers to that rag who’ve been out to get us since day one. Put up or shut up, folks. Where’s the video? Do you know the kind of pain you’re causing our families? How would you like it if we went after you like you’re going after us? Huh? Maybe I’ll just follow your wife and kids all around the place. How would you like that, huh? Get your own house in order before sticking your nose in our business. Disgruntled ex-employees. Put up or shut up. Put up or shut up.

They are the words of those who are never willing to accept responsibility for any negative consequences of their actions. It’s always someone else’s fault. Question them and their motives and the response is always to push back, to challenge, never to answer or explain. Accuse me? Accuse you.

It’s worked for them so far because up until now the other side has blinked. Turned away and moved on to try and work around them. playingchickenjpgBacking down is an understandable instinct when confronted with such aggressive certainty. Nobody can be that sure of themselves and be so willfully wrong, can they?

Yes they can.

We’ve saved the taxpayers a billion dollars, folks.

An entirely fictitious number Team Ford has picked out of thin air to repeat over and over in response to any and all allegations that are fired at it. Part of an incantation of nebulous claims invoked to help ward of the inevitable reality of it all. A billion dollars. The unelected premier. Social elites who’ve run this city for 50 years. Stir in an eye of newt, click your heels twice and poof, everything’s fine, everything’s good, the wolves are no longer at the door.

“False. Absolutely, definitely false.” “Confront. Attack. Repeat.”

It’s the political calculus that has worked like a charm. It’s transformed a fringe city councillor into an unlikely mayor, and his even fringier brother into a bullying power broker. Unfortunately, it’s also ground the wheels of governance of a big, vibrant, progressive city to a near halt.

Mayor Ford and those choosing to remain defiantly in his camp can continue believing that everything’s fine, everything’s hunky dory, and that all the problems that exist are because of other people. Why wouldn’t they? It’s got them this far.

therewillbeblood

But everybody else at City Hall needs to start operating outside of the mayor’s crank circle. Leave them to burn their little playhouse down. It was inevitable they would anyway. Ford Nation was built for little else.

—  exasperatedly submitted by Cityslikr

My Problem With Conservatives

“You need to friend yourself some conservative friends.”

This coming across the desk at me from someone who, acaphlegmicif the universe worked in such a manner, could be the spawn of Charles Bukowski and Jeff Lebowski.

I’d discovered Acaphlegmic at the computer this morning when I swung by the office. Before I could even ask him what he was doing, he’d quickly shut everything down, mumbling something about having a bone to pick with the Nobel judges. Under most other situations, this would be a cause for alarm with every reason to assume we would now be on some sort of watch list from some sort of authority somewhere. But I was pretty sure Acaphlegmic remained oblivious to the power of the interwebs, believing us always to be magically connected at the slightest push of any button on the keyboard in front of him.

“Friend myself?”

“You’re living too much inside the bubble. You need to diversify your thoughts, acquaint yourself with the Other. You’ve lost perspective, my friend. You’ve lost perspective.”

Again, this was a little rich coming from Acaphlegmic, the only actual real life hippie I know. A man with the Spirit of `68 tattooed across his shoulders. A man who, while frequently unable to remember your name during the course of a single conversation, could recite The Wave passage from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, word for word, in even the most stuporous of stupors.bukowski

Seriously. I need more conservative friends?

It was true. I am not feeling at my charitable best these days toward conservatives and conservative thought. (I submit these posts here and here as proof of that claim.) But I think I am hardly to blame in this dissatisfaction. Look around. Conservative ideology has devolved into a place of solace for the bitter and the deranged. In my day, the cranky old man schtick on the CBC was performed by the likes of Gordon Sinclair. Compare that with Kevin O’Leary and tell me which one of us has changed. Me or conservatism?

Leaning in toward Acaphlegmic, “Don’t tell me. Some of your best friends are conservative.”.

“You’d be surprised,” was his response. And as a matter of fact, I would be, yes.

thebiglebowski“Name me one reasonable conservative politician since Bill Clinton,” I asked him.

This seemed to throw him for moment but not for the reason I expected.

“Who said anything about conservatives being reasonable?” he responded. “I’m not saying you need to embrace their politics. You just need to befriend one or two. Pretend like you actually think anything they have to say on how the world is run makes a lick of sense. Fake it.”

“Why? If I’m not even going to try. Why bother?”

I mean, I’m sure there are conservatives out there who’d be engaging dinner party companions. A few you could go to a ball game with, talk sports shit. Hell, I imagine I could share a plate of oysters and a bottle of Cab with someone like Councillor John Parker, and then go take in a performance of Tom Stoppard’s – note to self: I’ve read somewhere that Stoppard is of a conservative bent. He’d be a conservative you could probably spend time with — Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead at Soulpepper (coming this February and March) and have a gay old time (in the Flintstones sense of the word rather than its more modern usage) of it.dontmentionthewar

But we would never talk politics.

It’s like that episode of Fawlty Towers when the Germans come to stay at the inn. “Don’t mention the war!” Basil implored before hitting his head on something or other and goose-stepping around the dining room. Don’t mention the war.

Just like you don’t mention politics if you want to have a civil conversation with a conservative.

They’re not up to it anymore.

Take the aforementioned Councillor Parker for example.

Seems perfectly congenial, with a dry sense of humour. We’ve talked often of the noticeable positive change in tone at council meetings when he assumes the speaker’s chair in place of the hyper-partisan, rabid oversight of Speaker Frances Nunziata. As a member of the TTC commission, Councillor Parker was front-and-centre in his very laid back manner in which he helped de-rail Mayor Ford’s pursuit of subways. johnparker“Goofy”, I believe his descriptor was of the burying of the Eglinton crosstown as it journeyed across the Don Valley.

But then Councillor Parker has not been above the eye-rolling antic of intoning ‘Greece’ as the economic path we’re going down if we don’t rein in our spending. That’s nonsense a crazy conservative like Doug Ford spouts when he’s run out of other empty platitudes not a supposed thoughtful conservative like John Parker. To try and draw parallels between Greece and Toronto in terms of fiscal problems is simply an open admission that you’re not to be considered a serious participant in our civic conversation.

“See? Right there,” Acaphlegmic interrupted my train of thought. “That kind of talk suggests you’re not really interested in understanding a conservative point of view.”

(Yes. I do realize a certain glaring gaffe just took place which, at closer inspection suggests Acaphlegmic must’ve been reading my mind. Indulge me that narrative tic, if you will.)

“But you just said conservatives weren’t reasonable and it wasn’t necessary to embrace their politics!”

“I did. But you have to be open-minded and make the appearance of listening and considering.”

Aside from the fact it was a stance Acaphlegmic would never take, I am of the opinion we are bombarded by conservative political views, monotonously and regularly. It’s not like we have to actively seek it out. After 30 years or so of indoctrination through our mainstream media, we can rhyme the rhetoric off by rote. fingerscrossedSmall government, yes. Big business, yes. Unions, bad. Free markets, free of regulation. Low taxes, big profits. Trickle down. All boats lifted.

And frankly, if conservatives would just be honest with their political ideology, I’d be much more conducive to having a conversation with them. But they’re not. They hide behind the pseudo-science of economic theories, pretending it’s all about fiscal ‘discipline’ I believe they call it when we’ve seen it’s anything but.

Pre-mayor Rob Ford was a conservative politician who put it all out there. He hated the idea of paying taxes and the notion of government spending on anything other than public safety and the ease of car travel. He frequently listed off the businesses government shouldn’t be in the business of but then, something happened.

No service cuts, guaranteed.

He or someone smarter than he was on the campaign team knew that the councillor’s true conservative politics would never fly with a plurality of the electorate. Want to see Ford Nation shrivel up and blow away? Be upfront with the implications of conservative ideology. Of course, there’s going to be slashing and burning of services and programs. How else do you think we’re going to balance the books without raising taxes? You want something? You pay for it.

That’s not a winnable mandate. thesuddenlyConservatives know that, so they lie about their intentions. It’s government by euphemism.

So here in Toronto, conservative councillors wrap themselves in a cloak of debt fear in order to siphon off operating funds to unnecessarily pay down chunks of capital expenses to avoid the impending financial cataclysm only they can see. Deceitful disingenuousness or a monumental lack of understanding of how municipal financing works? Hardly matters. It’s bad enough having such wrong-thinking politicians at the levers of power let alone contemplating hanging out with any of them socially.

“Did you hear what I was just thinking, Acaphlegmic?”

But I’d lost him. He’d nodded off during my last internal tirade as, I fear, many of you have.

So let me just wrap up. It’s not the conservative politics I dislike so much. It’s the shady, under-handed way the beast is propagated that I can’t abide. Who wants to be friends with anyone so untrustworthy?

up frontly submitted by Cityslikr

We Won’t Pay. We Can Pay. But You Pay.

Just another quick thought after this week’s deputations at the Budget Committee. My magnum opus on the subject is coming tomorrow. onemorething(That’s what you call a self-imposed deadline, folks. Fear of a ‘What is this shit again? You promised something weighty today’ response.)

At committee end yesterday, councillors split into their respective camps over the proposed 2013 budget, not coincidentally, the visiting ones largely on the ‘nay’ side while the mayor’s men, committee members, lining up in formation in the ‘yea’ aisle. To Take On More Debt Or Not To Take On More Debt. That was the question.

For a much more in-depth explanation of this budgetary divide, you need to read Matt Elliott’s analysis, Budget 101. But the gist of it is, some elected officials see debt as a useful tool in building and maintaining stuff a city needs like, say, basic infrastructure. Sewers, roads and sidewalks, transit. Others see debt and soil themselves.

Yeah. I think that about sums it up. Self-proclaimed fiscal conservatives want to run a government nothing like they would their households or businesses even while proclaiming that’s exactly what they’re trying to do. And they’re the ones who keep bringing that analogy up. Funny, that.

Never mind how Councillor Doug Ford used his three minutes to sum up the budget direction. Nonsense and hyperbole largely. Just a rehash of his greatest hits. Everything we’ve heard before, signifying nothing. womanscream(More Shakespearean allusions to give this thing some heft.)

Councillor Peter Milczyn piped in saying this budget and this administration he’s been an integral part of has done nothing more radical than reverse the Miller years’ habit of ‘spending money we didn’t have’, I believe is how he put it. Note to self: email councillor_milczyn@toronto.ca and ask how exactly he bought his house or car for that matter.

I know, I know.

I hate having to go to that well all the time but how else do you respond to such inane views of public sector financing? Seriously? I’m asking because I’ve tapped it dry and politicians like Councillor Milczyn never seem to tire of making such ridiculous claims.

Councillor John Parker took a more intriguing angle on the debt question. Citing the entirely self-imposed 15% debt level of the city’s property tax revenues, he suggested council shouldn’t aim for it simply because it was there. How’d he put it exactly? You don’t put canaries down a coal mine just to kill them. As if councillors want to mount that entirely artificial debt ceiling simply because it’s there and not because there’s pressing shit the city has to build and repair. But for the likes of Councillor Parker – a one-term member of the Mike Harris government, it should be noted regularly, a player on the team who kick-started us down this path of fiscal instability – debt ceilings, even ones as entirely manufactured as this one is, are there to be feared and trembled before, shied away from at all costs.

And make no mistake, there will be costs to such debt fear, there have been costs already (*A-hem, A-hem* TCHC repair backlog. The crumbling Gardiner. *A-hem, A-hem*). bleakfutureThose proclaiming that, at the end of the day, these are the times we live in, have played a major part in getting us here. In these times. At the end of the day. Catchphrases devoid of any real meaning, replacing real argument.

It seems perfectly acceptable and fiscally upright to defend our children and grandchildren from a future weighed down by financial debt. Yet somehow handing them the baton of decrepit infrastructure is hunky dory. Yes, kids. We could’ve helped you out, paid for some of this when interest rates were low and the costs less but instead, we saved ourselves a few bucks and left you to it. You’re welcome.

That’s what you call fiscal conservatism in these days we live in.

matter-of-factly submitted by Cityslikr