An Empty Mandate

The timing of this is absolutely going to come across as pure sour grapes. Two days after being snubbed, left on the cutting room floor by the Globe and Mail’s Marcus Gee in his article about Toronto’s City Hall bloggers and tweeters, here I go about to attack him. But let me just say in my defence that I think Mr. Gee did me a favour. In hindsight the decision to let fly with my impressions of various councillors during our interview was probably ill-advised.

“I used to beat up twerps like you in high school,” I bellowed at Mr. Gee, bringing my Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti A-game to the table. “Give you wedgies and dunk your head in the toilet bowl.”

Yes, as a matter of fact, I really do need to re-think my PR strategy.

Besides, this won’t be the first time I have disagreed enough with the Globe columnist to write a response. In fact, it was pretty much on this very same issue that I expressed my displeasure with him back in March, long before we ever chatted in person. Just so we’re clear on my motivations here.

On Friday, Marcus was at it again, bemoaning the aimless drift of the city under Mayor Ford’s watch. “After a string of whuppings on transit, Mr. Ford is looking more and more isolated on the council he is supposed to lead,” Mr. Gee wrote on Friday. “With two and a half years left in his four-year term, his ability to implement his agenda is fading. That may strike many Torontonians as a good thing. It’s not. For one thing, a city with as many pressing challenges as this one can’t afford to drift rudderless till 2014.”

OK, again. Just because the mayor appears to be drifting aimlessly does not mean the city is. The mayor is one component of municipal governance, a very important component certainly, the only council member elected city-wide and with slightly better access to the levers of power, but still only one vote of 45 ultimately.

Mr. Gee rightfully characterizes Mayor Ford’s last few months as a display of ‘abysmal leadership’ which should be his story, end stop. A mayor is elected to lead, in Toronto is given some tools to help further an agenda. After a year or so of doing exactly that, this mayor has ceased performing that function. No one has taken it away from him, tied up him ‘with a thousand tiny bonds’. He’s just continually failed to muster the majority of votes needed to win crucial votes at council. There’s nobody to blame but himself and his staff for that.

And yet, the business of the city carries on. While Gee sees last week’s council vote on contracting out cleaners as a victory for those looking “… to handcuff the city’s attempts to get private contractors to take over some cleaning jobs…” and some sort of plot by ‘a resurgent left wing’ on council “…to block any attempt to contract out services to private companies”, that’s an angle seen purely through an ideological lens. Councillor Ana Bailão, who put forth the motion, stated right up front that it wasn’t about stopping the practice of contracting out. She wanted better oversight of how and to whom the contracts were given.

Her motion seemed to be largely in reaction to the mess that emerged back in 2010, before Rob Ford was even elected mayor, with the contracting out of cleaning services for Union Station. The possible use of undocumented workers, not paying them the agreed upon hourly wage and a questionable renewal of the contract all suggested the city needed to be more vigilant in its contracting out process. As we go further down that road, Councillor Bailão’s motion looks more like a strengthening of safeguards rather than merely putting on the brakes to a mayoral initiative.

While Mayor Ford’s former press secretary and now Toronto Sun something or other, Adrienne Batra, sees the same leftist plotting and nefariousness at City Hall as Marcus Gee, she puts the blame for its success squarely where it belongs: in the lap of the mayor. “The mayor — not his staff, not his brother, not his executive, not his unpaid advisors — needs to dig down and find the same passion for the job he had when he was first elected,” Batra writes, “to carry him through the remainder of his first term. That is, if he wants a second one.”

A second term?! What on earth would Mayor Ford do with another 4 years? He doesn’t even know what to do with the next 30 months.

Both Ms. Batra and Mr. Gee miss what, I think, is the major cause of the mayor’s sudden flirtation with irrelevancy. His 2010 election platform was the thinnest of thin gruel. Because it was exclusively based on unfounded rhetoric and almost impossible to implement promises, there was no way it could sustain one term, never mind two. To the city’s fiscal detriment, he pushed through the repeal of the Vehicle Registration Tax and kept property tax increases below the rate of inflation. The savings from his major accomplishments of cutting councillors’ office expenses and securing concessions from city workers without any labour strife don’t appear to cover the loss in revenue from the tax cuts and freezes which doesn’t bode well for another campaign promise of the mayor’s, eliminating the Land Transfer Tax.

Mayor Ford did get the ball rolling with contracting out waste collection and nothing in Councillor Bailão’s successful motion last week threatens that. Hopefully, it will serve to alert not only city council but the public also to the possible problems that come with contracting out. If we’ve learned nothing else from the last 16 months or so, it’s that the easy peazy manner of running a city the mayor promised was pure delusion. We do, in fact, have a revenue problem and the spending problem that was so out of control? Yeah, not so much.

When a politician romps into office based on such out-and-out fantasy, it’s hardly surprising that he, sooner rather than later, gets bogged down in the mire of reality. Marcus Gee implores city councillors to ‘let’ Mayor Ford get ‘at least some things done.’ I’d suggest they already have and are now hard at work trying to mitigate the fallout of having done so.

not bitterly submitted by Cityslikr

4 thoughts on “An Empty Mandate

  1. I always thought Marcus Gee was on “our side”; the side that sees Ford’s mayoralty as a disgrace, his demeanor a joke, his intelligence questionable and his politics ideological nonsense.
    Until I read his article on Friday. “let the mayor at least get things done”? Get things done like screw up this city in a myriad of ways?
    Um ok Mr. Gee. I have no idea what has come over this guy.

  2. Mr. Gee suggesting that Council “let the mayor at least, get some things done” only suggests to me that Mr. Gee is not paying attention. We are paying dearly already for the things he “got done”. As usual I love your point of view and I’d also add. You didn’t really want to be pegged “eminince grise” did you? It sounds like something more suited to my profession than yours. Eminince grise with a side of frites perhaps?
    What I find quite baffling is why Ford would even be suggesting he’s after a second term doing something he so obviously detests. Do he and Holyday really imagine that they will somehow come up with a bunch of mindless automatons who will get elected on the strength of his endorsement and then proceed to do as they are told? Is he familiar with “fool me once….”? I keep asking “are they really that deluded”? Apparently they are. Or I’m the fool and I would like to think not.
    Thank you for my favourite read of the day.

  3. Marcus Gee is an ass. Not as incomprehensible as SAL but so far below the writing talent of Edward Keenan or your fine self Cityslikr that he is trivial.

    • Marcus Gee certainly knows how to flip people’s FU switches but he obviously believes that he’s presenting an objective view of a troubled/troublesome city administration and that he’s being tough but fair. Ironically, so does Sue Ann Levy. In my opinion, the two of them cancel each other out.
      The most salient point in your blog is the awakening of city council to the fact that there’s much that goes on in the city that they have little or no control over, but should. Their determination to change that is admirable. Doug Holyday can have all the hissy fits he likes but it won’t, hopefully, deter the more reasonable members of council from this course of action. The first indication of their awakening was earlier this year was when John Filion, upon realizing that city council has no say whatsoever in regard to locking out union employees, moved a motion to wrest that responsibility from the Labour Relations Committee and give final say to the council in its entirety. Unfortunately, that motion was defeated. However, since then there’s been a noticeable move by council to take back that kind of authority – the decision on and the approval of contracting out being their first success. So the Toronto Sun and Doug Holyday thinks this is a travesty? Hard cheese.

      As for Adrienne Batra’s statement that the mayor needs to rediscover his “passion for the job”, that’s a real knee-slapper. I won’t bother picking that bit of stupidity apart. I’ll leave that to you for another post.

Leave a Reply