So the Nanos poll arrived yesterday on the virtual doorstep with a dull, deadening thud of a wet, weekend newspaper on the front porch. Rob Ford now has an eye-popping lead of nearly 25% over his closest opponent. Surprising? Unquestionably. But the source of the surprise goes deeper and wider than just the fact that Ford is even being touted as a viable mayoral candidate.
The poll is startling because I thought in the last couple weeks there’d been a shift in tone to the debate from an avalanche of negativity about the state of the city to one more reasoned and composed. Take, for example, Alan Broadbent’s letter on the Maytree Foundation website. While all we’ve been hearing over the course of the spring and summer from most of the candidates running for mayor how bad a shape the city is in – i.e. rampant fiscal irresponsibility, a non-responsiveness to citizens’ needs, the phantasmagorical “War on Cars” – that characterization may be, well, a little over the top. “Toronto nowadays is a progressive and welcoming city with a thriving economy, flourishing arts scene and renowned cuisine. Its education and healthcare provision are among the best in the world.” So says the The Telegraph U.K. But, they’re probably just a bunch of Chelsea elites.
So, what’s with this disconnect and the Fordian anti-everything appeal?
I lay a large portion of the blame on the campaigns of George Smitherman and Rocco Rossi. Despite the fact that our current mayor stated his intention not to seek another term last September, both men decided to run in opposition to him. Rather than talking about how they’d build on the successes of the Miller administration and fix the things it messed up, they chose to portray Toronto on a steep, Skeleton speed decline toward 3rd world status. They (with mainstream media assistance) created the anti-City Hall environment that is Rob Ford’s milieu and his only strength as a candidate. To use Bill Maher’s reference to the Tea Party’s ascension within the Republican Party, Teams Rossi and Smitherman let the Frankenstein out of the castle and lost any control over it.
Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone should also shoulder some of the blame for not vigorously defending the administration that he was an integral part of. Only belatedly has he embraced the sentiments about Toronto expressed by The Telegraph and tried to force back the apocalyptic visions stirred up by his opponents. Too often he was sheepish in defending the accomplishments achieved at City Hall over the course of the past 7 years. An odd tactic to take since some polls released over the past month or so suggest that David Miller would be the front runner in this race if he was in it. Clearly, a sizeable chunk of people who live here believe that we haven’t been on the wrong track.
People like us here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke also need to accept responsibility for the Ford phenomenon. We clearly misunderestimated the man’s appeal and spent much time focusing on his appearance and personal foibles although, in terms of the latter, there is much overlap between the man’s shortcomings and his politics. Clearly, we should’ve concentrated our efforts purely on his ideas, policies and what a Ford mayoralty would look like if he actually won. (Like Eye Weekly’s Edward Keenan did last week.) I guess the idea of Rob Ford actually winning on October 25th seemed so impossible to contemplate that it hardly seemed worth the effort of criticizing him as if such a thing could ever happen.
There’s still five weeks to go until the election. Federal and provincial don’t officially start until around now. With such a commanding lead, the scrutiny on Rob Ford will only increase in its intensity no matter how much his handlers try to keep him in a bubble and not allow him to make any serious blunders. But the Nanos’ numbers do suggest a huge hole that those chasing him have to try and dig themselves out of. As John McGrath pointed out this morning on Twitter, a candidate hoping to overtake Ford not only needs to build their own numbers but they have to cut into Ford’s support.
How they do that, I’m ashamed to admit that I have no idea. The Rob Ford Army is entrenched and their belief in his candidacy as the cure for all that they see ails Toronto is firm and not subject to much dissuasion. Point out that their man’s transit plan is completely impractical, will not alleviate congestion and has almost zero chance of ever, ever being implemented and their response is ‘Stop the War on Cars’! Or that his electoral reform idea of cutting council by half would represent the complete antithesis of increasing accountability and responsiveness, and they’ll demand ‘Respect For the Taxpayer’! All that ‘corruption’ he claims happens behind closed doors at City Hall like the Tuggs deal? Had he been doing his job as a member of the auditing committee, he could’ve sent the deal to be audited by casting the deciding vote but was in absentia at that particular meeting. No matter because when he’s mayor, Rob Ford will ‘Stop the Gravy Train’!
It seems once Rob Ford supporters cross that divide, there’s no getting them back. Failure to do so means he will be Toronto’s next mayor and no one else is to blame except ourselves. Those 54% of us who cannot even begin to fathom the prospect of His Worship Rob Ford.
— stumpedly submitted by Cityslikr
Sept 20th 2010 I’m glad that the election is over and Rob Ford has won. He got what he wished for and so did the city who voted for him. I just go back to writing about the wrong things being promoted to save us from ourselves by the Chicken Little Gores of the world. The idiots of Toronto have spoken and loudly and won heartedly.
I will then design and see about building an R3000 home in Northern N.B. high on a hill where the oceans won’t reach even if all the ice melts. Best of Luck Toronto, without me you’re gonna need it.
Dear Mr. Firth,
We here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke don’t think you can use the everything-will-go-to-hell-in-a-handbasket-unless-you-elect-me platform. It would be utter plagiarization of the Ford, Smitherman and Rossi campaigns. Not sure there’s any room left at the table for you.
he may be in the lead, and he may win, but having a common enemy isnt that bad. and judging from his personal blog, http://www.blobford.com , i dont think we’ll have much to worry about.
The “blog” is old news. Instead of everyone rehashing the same old topics, videos and comments about Rob Ford. It would be best to start talking out the other candidates.
The constant buffoon label from the other candidates just over shadows their message.
We here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke thought that’s what we were doing here, talking about the other candidates. Unless of course you mean the other, other candidates. We’ve been doing that too. On Fridays.
That Eye Weekly article (and the earlier article that it links to) lead to an interesting thought… they make it very clear that Ford has never been a big-picture kind of guy, always choosing simple direct action over careful large-scale planning, and personally being helpful to the constituents in his ward over being productive in city council meetings. He even said in that earlier interview that he saw his work for his constituents as being his real job, and what he did in council as not that important.
I think this film captures nicely the basic principle that Ford represents:
Maybe that’s why the people who like him aren’t bothered by his very obviously flawed “big picture” ideas. In the best-case scenario, it won’t matter: Ford will focus on bringing the excellent “personal customer-service” of his home ward to the whole city (since that’s what he says he most enjoys doing, and the aspect of his platform that would get the least resistance), while not being very effective at shaping the “big picture” from above. A kind of bottom-up approach to changing things, if you will.
Maybe this’ll be a good thing for the city. That’s the optimistic view. I’d like to have some hope.
I do like Ford’s plan for a continuous network of bicycle routes off the main roads, though (5:51 in his “Rob Ford Transportation Plan” video on Youtube). Don’t know how feasible it is, but it sounds nice in principle.
Ford may be considered right-wing, but in his own campaign he’s careful to seem centrist. (or has my perception been skewed by exposure to US politics?)