Yesterday’s budget committee agenda printout was thick, like medium sized town phone book thick. Lots of financial statement audits, variance reports, funding pressure and financing options…Yeah, a ‘phone book’. A compiling of names, numbers and addresses, usually done alphabetically by surname, in book or catalogue form. Catalogue? Retailers used to…
Oh never mind.
Yesterday’s budget committee agenda printout was thick, like deep-dish pizza thick. But alas, the budget committee meeting was thin, like the thinnest of thin gruel…Gruel?
The point is, here we were, the first budget committee meeting since the summer break, the first budget committee meeting of the fall session where one might expect some sort of direction set going forward, priorities established, an imprimatur from the administration to signal its future intentions, and what we got was bupkus. A whole lot of the committee chair, Budget Chief Del Grande, pushing and passing value for money audits on various city agencies like Invest Toronto and Toronto Hydro.
(And as our friend David Hains said, waggishly – Mr. Hains says many things in that manner – it’s not as if value for money audits weren’t something KPMG couldn’t have done while they were on the clock.)
It almost seems as if the budget chief’s killing time, concocting make-work projects to give the appearance of something happening. In the absence of any leadership coming from the mayor’s office, his council allies are left to dangle, unsure of their next move. At least at the budgetary level there’s a general sense that cutting stuff is good and putting everyone on notice that their bottom line has to justify their existence won’t run too afoul of the mayor’s thinking.
Others aren’t as lucky.
Take TTC Chair Karen Stintz for example.
Her proposal to contract out bus cleaning has garnered Mayor Ford’s approval from afar. He gave the idea a shout out during his radio show on Sunday. As for a suggested fare hike in the new year? Not so fast there, Stintzie. The mayor doesn’t approve.
It must be like waiting for a distracted emperor’s thumbs up or down while he’s otherwise occupied in an orgy of ethical entanglements and conflict of interest concerns. Hey! I got my foot on his chest, sword at his throat. Yeah or nay, oh Mandated One?
To mix metaphors. The captain can’t steer the ship because he’s too busy bailing water pouring in from the countless leaks that have sprung. Unfortunately, no one’s yet prepared to assume the position of first mate. That’s not quite true. Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong is more than willing to take the helm, claiming to know where the mayor wants to take us. “To the shoals! To the shoals!”
We’ve about arrived at that Apocalypse Now point where Captain Willard’s about to go up river. He goes ashore at an American outpost under North Vietnamese fire and makes his way along a trench until he comes across a soldier indiscriminately firing shots into the darkness at the unseen enemy. Asking if he’s in charge, Willard is met with a malignantly blank stare. “Aren’t you?” the soldier responds.
Ill-governed is Toronto at this point. Mayor Ford seems less interested in running the city than he does running for his own political survival. Each step he takes only lands him deeper into a questionable ethical swamp of his own making.
As we head further into this season of misrule, council’s going to have to make an important decision in order to avoid the entire operation grinding to a halt. They can, like the budget chief, pretend that everything’s hunky dory, there’s nothing to see here, all the madness is purely media generated and it’ll pass like all storm clouds do. Or they can do the responsible thing and move into informal post-Ford, non-partisan formations and get on with the business of governing.
The mayor’s still the mayor but he’s done acting like one. He’s decided to take a spot on the sidelines where he’s always been most comfortable, making catcalls and blowing raspberries. His colleagues need to acknowledge that reality and move on, ignoring the crazy man yelling incoherently at them.
— cut baitedly submitted by Cityslikr
They don’t have to cut anything. Like I deputed last winter I guestimated that they would have an “over 100 million surplus” for 2012 AND would say the same for 2013 trending…
Since Carney is not going to move much on interest rates; the Land Tranfer Tax will continue to bring in a surplus despite that new group that wants to get rid of it.
Mr Ford really seems to have zero interest in actually being mayor. It seems to me he lost interest about when he realized there was actual work involved. It has long been my suspicion that what we are seeing now is nothing new. His biggest error was not realizing the spot light tends to be on the man at the top of the pyramid.
As the lone man councillor he was for 10 years he often bragged that he spent zero of the cities money. This is not a difficult feat when you pretty much do nothing but make ignorant and uninformed comments from the side lines and refuse to be involved on any level with your colleagues.
I suspect what we are viewing is buisiness as usual. No one really cared what he wa up to when all he was was that obnoxious chubby councillor from Etobicoke. His current discombobulation comes from the fact that he can’t figure out why we’re all so mad. He’s always done business like this. What’s the problem?
He wanted to win the seat. he didn’t want to actually do the job.
Fords proposed a Ferris Wheel and a shopping concourse and where ridiculed for the notion. Low and behold, NYC Mayor Bloomberg proposes the same thing and is heralded as the next great thing.
I see you are still fucking the goats eh! Dream a Doug Ford dream…
Explain the differences in the Fords vs Bloomberg proposing a Ferris wheel.
You expose the problem with politics. You hear from the person you hate, you hate the idea. Hear the same idea from someone you admire and you love the idea. Pity.
If we here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke can interject for just a moment.
One of the major problems people had with the councillor’s ferris wheel/monorail/shopping mall idea for the Port Lands was that there were already plans in place, in the works for over a decade. Councillor Ford just disregarded them to set up his circus.
Is Mayor Bloomberg’s ferris wheel plan similarly bulldozing an already established plan for Staten Island?
We ask because we really don’t know. Do you?
The plans sound eerily familiar – http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/bloomberg-proposes-world-tallest-ferris-wheel-staten-island-article-1.1169336 [insert mad scientist laughter here]
ps. Staten Island waterfront has had various plans for green space development, etc. But this replaces them all.
ps. Note the line about “no public dollars being used” from Bloomberg.
Forgot to point out to look at the number of jobs the Staten Island project is going to create and noting the project will be a “game changer”.
It’s still a stupid idea because a larger City let’s say Mexico City OR Tokyo would build the largest ferris wheel after supposedly Toronto OR NYC. So there…
By that reasoning, we shouldn’t build anything because some other city will build a bigger, larger, taller tower, aquarium, waterfront, green space or transit system.
AS was mentioned; the land was planned for something else in the first place. Round and round you troll for Ford…
So was the land in Staten Island and along came Bloomberg.
Typical Fordite; pointing the finger elsewhere when the original topic was on the upcoming proposed budget.