Deputations And Disregard

Let it be a given that annual public consultations on City Hall’s proposed budget are, always have been and always will be an exercise in, if not futility, let’s call it pretense. The people talk. City councillors (at least, those with a hand in crafting the budget) pretend to listen. A show trial of democracy without all the messiness of executions afterward.

So I hesitate to suggest that the consultations currently underway for budget 2011 are any more of a façade than previous ones but some councillors and the mayor seem to be jettisoning even the pretense of pretending. After hearing overwhelmingly from deputants telling him that they’d prefer no service cuts to tax cuts, Mayor Ford claimed that, “Obviously people want a zero-percent tax increase. I’ve heard it from all over.” Someone get the mayor a Q-Tip. Clearly he has some waxy build-up.

And after a particularly fractious and protracted process in East York, Budget Chief Mike Del Grande reportedly quipped that he “heard lots of numbers but at end of the day, I’m not sure it’s reflective.” Not reflective of what, Councillor Del Grande? The opinion of a vast majority of people who took the time to come out and have their voices heard? Or just not reflective of the opinions of those you agree with?

But, to be fair to the Budget Chief, he had endured what sounded like a grueling quarter of a day or so, defending the proposed budget out in East York. Me? I chose to attend the meeting up in North York as it was much easier to get to from downtown. I’m all about getting involved in the democratic process as long as it doesn’t put me out too much.

The proceedings in the council chambers at the North York Civic Centre were more placid than those, it appears, in East York. One might even call them somnolent. Presided over by a congenial even folksy Councillor Ford, deputants came and went, almost exclusively decrying the budget’s proposed cuts to both services and taxes without raising much of a stir from the other members of the budget committee. Councillors Milczyn, Parker, Shiner, Di Giorgio and Deputy Mayor Holyday rarely interacted with anyone other than themselves, asking few questions of the deputants or providing little to no feedback. Only when those stepping forward to speak heaped praise upon the proposed budget (I counted 4 of the 40 or so deputations doing so) did any of these councillors snap to attention or show even a lick of interest.

In fact, the four hours of deputations could’ve been completed in half the time if it hadn’t been for Councillor Shelley Carroll and, to a lesser extent, Anthony Perruzza. They, along with Councillor Ford, appeared to be the only ones from the council perspective who came to actually listen and react to deputations. Carroll did much more than that. Ask questions, tweet pictures, head up into the crowd to assist deputants who were having trouble figuring out the process. It was the Shelley Show, and when she finished up in North York, she made her way over to the East York location to pitch in there.

To be honest, these deputations are in many ways as much about Carroll’s time as budget chief as they are about the 2011 budget. While the proposed document sets out Mayor Ford’s plan for Toronto, it is also a complete repudiation of the previous administration. Tax and spend. A spending problem not a revenue problem. (Dis)respect For The Taxpayers. That which made The Gravy Train run. All of it (or at least the last 4 years) under Carroll’s fiscal watch.

She is the remaining face of the Miller administration’s power group. The mayor retired voluntarily. His Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone, Speaker Sandra Bussin, protégé Adam Giambrone, likewise all gone, less voluntarily. Carroll is the last one standing. She is doing so boldly and unwaveringly.

Carroll was at her best last night when she tangled with the few speakers who heaped praise on the budget for its attacks on spending and taxes but offered little in the way of helpful suggestions about which fat to trim. This includes the Board of Trade’s Carol Wilding who categorically refused to go on the record to say which services she would recommend cutting in order for the city to achieve a budgetary balance. Distancing herself from the dirty business of fiscal belt-tightening, all she would say when asked about cuts was that it was all in the presentation she’d handed out to the councillors.

It was especially invigorating to witness Councillor Carroll verbally pick up the representative from the Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses by the scruff of the neck and point that, for all his squawking about tax relief for businesses, he had failed to inform his membership and the public at large about the special program the Miller administration had established to help smaller businesses offset property tax increases. Much blubbering and backtracking ensued from Mr. CFIB and no attempted assistance from Councillor Di Giorgio could rescue him. At least, I think it was assistance Di Giorgio was offering. It was never clear exactly what he was up to on the rare occasions he opened his mouth.

Councillor Carroll is emerging as the voice of sanity at City Hall in the face of the Ford juggernaut. She has been relentless in not only defending the spirit of the Miller administration but in insisting on reasonable debate and discussion, conducted in the proper manner using established protocol. She is standing firm in front of the bulldozer Ford and his boys want to take to our municipal government.

She is being assisted certainly by the likes of Councillors Vaughan, Perks, Davis and McConnell. The difference is, the mayor’s supporters will all dismiss these as downtown, pinko, left wing, elitist kooks. That’s a smear they can’t use on Carroll. Despite her high rank in the Miller administration, she has serious big L liberal pedigree (which we don’t hold against her) and represents a suburban ward, deep up in Ford Country. She should be one of them. She’s not. This makes her a formidable foe of the mayor which we should remember and hold onto when things begin to look bleak.

And there will be times over the course of the next 4 years when things will look bleak.

fan boyishly submitted by Cityslikr

8 thoughts on “Deputations And Disregard

  1. “..but offered little in the way of helpful suggestions about which fat to trim.”

    Deputants should not be expected to have such an intimate knowledge of how City Departments are run as to suggest which ones could yield efficiencies. This leads me to suspect you found delight in the plight of the majority of the deputants since you make special mention of Mr CFIB’s discomfort. How typical.

    “Ford juggernaut”, indeed, same old alarmist stuff – won’t that do a lot for your career. You’re headed for “bogger” status not “blogger”. How about changing the tune?

    “…defending the spirit of the Miller administration but in insisting on reasonable debate and discussion, conducted in the proper manner using established protocol.”

    SC tried that for 4 years, didn’t she? All during that time (when you were MIA) she ignored deputants and dished out loads of the Miller spirit. How come you give her loads of wriggle room? Probably because you operate under “any enemy of Ford is a friend of mine” rules.

    Your energies are wasted.

  2. Two thumbs way up for capturing the mood of the Toronto Budget Public Consultation.

    Two thumbs down for Peter MacQuarie’s comment.

  3. “Deputants should not be expected to have such an intimate knowledge of how City Departments are run as to suggest which ones could yield efficiencies. ”

    So what, exactly, is the point of these meetings? Ford’s justification for his platform is that he’s shaping policy based on the half-hearted murmers of the populace (as long as they agree with him, I guess) – “MOAR SUBWAYZ”, “BAN UNIUNS”, “NO TAXES” etc.

    So does the public know what it wants or don’t they?

    • I believe the public get things like bridges (DM) and vehicle taxes (RF) canceled but everything else is taken off the table immediately after the Mayor takes office.

      This City has ignored deputants at meetings like this for many, many years and this is at the very core of what’s wrong.

      Belittling the public with slurs (MOAR SUBWAYZ) isn’t going to help. Re-directing your energies to making a positive contribution might.

      • Honestly, if there is more depth to Ford’s justifications I’d thank you to point me to it. Any question of his transit platform (which, if we’re being frank, is little more than ‘moar subwayz’) is greeted by ‘mandate for subways’. I’m not saying there aren’t justifications and very good reasons for subways but I haven’t heard ONE from Ford.

        Where are your positive contributions, Peter? All I’ve seen from your comments here are soapbox platitudes and casual digs at the creators of the blog. I’m not trying to white-knight them or anything but you can’t slag off everyone in sight while calling for
        them to take the high road and expect to be taken seriously, sir.

    • mcflash, there isn’t much depth to RF’s positions. Let’s hope over the 4 years Toronto will have him leading Council he can make a decent job of it though. Remember, we have a democratic process and he’ll be trying to satisfy the majority which might not please you. However, the city will still function and I doubt there’s much he will do that could cause a lot of harm.

      IMO, he’s not the problem with Toronto’s municipal affairs.

      I believe I have a duty to call you out for demeaning those citizens who think the city would be better served with subways. (It’s the way my parents raised me.) Do you think poor manners make a positive contribution?

      Have another look at the majority of comments here and tell me who has been taking anything seriously? AFUITBS certainly isn’t.

      I suspect too, by your infrequent posts, that you agree with their mission.

  4. Another Downtown Consultaion Jan. 22 at 2-4pm City Hall by Ward 20, 27 & 28 councillors click/scroll down for info

    Wednesday Night there were 40 something people who spoke from a final list of 70; some of the later people left… Last night in Scarborough, I was the 4th speaker and I confronted Mr. Ford with his suggestion during the campaign that property tax rise with inflation vs the freeze. The COMPROMISE would be 1% which would raise $35 milllion for TTC, tenant defence, save Urban Affairs library and to keep his promise to deal with bedbugs.

    Reading his body language he wasn’t going to move on the freeze. So I suggested looking at the police budget for savings to spend on childcare, youth services, rec. programs and seniors supports. I also encouraged the committee and the audience to participate in the TTC consultations next week, there are 4 and members may want to attend since people use transit to get from their housing to work, shopping etc.

Leave a Reply