Fight! Fight! Fight!

We here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke would like to begin 2010 2001 2011 by issuing an apology.

To all those sounding the alarm loudest and earliest about the prospect of a Mayor Rob Ford administration during last year’s municipal election campaign, we are truly sorry. While in no way could we have been viewed as sanguine about the possibility of Ford ascending to the office, we ultimately concluded that he would do less damage to the city than his right of centre rivals. Our thinking was based on the fact that as a councillor, Mr. Ford had developed no constituency on council and even less credibility. On the hustings, his constant braying about all the corrupt practices his colleagues engaged in behind closed doors couldn’t have made him any friends at 100 Queen Street West. Ford was a lone wolf, far more often than not on the losing end of votes. We reasoned that he’d have less ability to bring together a working majority to enact his radically right agenda than would, say, George Smitherman who’d be assuming the mayoralty with more or less a clean slate.

In short, we misunderestimated the power of the mayor’s office. Or, more precisely, we failed to realize just how flexible, let’s call it, a good chunk of council members would be in the face of the bluster and chest-beating that began emanating from Team Ford soon after their man was sworn in. The new mayor claimed he had a mandate which appears to be all a majority of councillors needed to hear and they handed it over to him, no questions asked. Would you like your shoes shined with that, Mr. Mayor?

We were wrong. We dropped the ball. Wish we could have a do-over. Nous nous excusons.

On the plus side, has there been a local politician who has drawn a line in the sand so deeply so quickly? Who’s so enthusiastically performed a cannonball into the deep end of the partisan pool and declared so explicitly that you’re either with him or ag’in him? Who has surrounded himself so thoroughly with people who think just like he does, who sees the world exactly as he does?

If the mayor is unprepared to offer any sort of olive branch of compromise to those not sharing his stunted view of the role of government, why should the onus be on his opponents to do so? Yes, the mayor holds a mitt full of high cards in his hand. He sets the agenda and his wish list takes priority. But the power of the office ends there. There is no special fiat declaring mechanism that is the sole privilege of the mayor. Despite what you may read in our newspapers, Mayor Ford cannot simply make a regal pronouncement, clap his hands and proclaim, “Make It So!”

We on the left side of the political spectrum have a terrible habit of trembling and bowing down before the bellowing triumphalism that inevitably follows a right winger’s win at the polls, no matter how close a race or dubious a victory. I’m thinking George W. in 2000 and again in 2004. Stephen Harper and his 2 straight minority governments, bestriding the narrow world like a Colossus. And we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about to find ourselves dishonourable graves (h/t W.S.) So far, too many of our city councillors have willingly rolled over onto their backs, ever hopeful for an affection rub of their tummies from the mayor. It’s a prone, vulnerable position that is usually taken as a sign of weakness and dealt with accordingly.

Granted, as Eye Weekly’s Edward Keenan noted a couple weeks back, the mayor’s had his way with the council on no-brainer issues (rightly or wrongly) like office expenses, the VRT and making the TTC an essential service (a decision that ultimately is up to Queen’s Park to make). “… low-hanging fruit,” Mr. Keenan wrote, “the bread and butter of Ford’s election campaign and, to any honest observer, the extent of his mandate.” But it’s given the mayor an air of indomitably and allowed him to dig in at the plate and sit on the next fat pitch he can try and go yard with.

So already this early in the game, it’s time to brush the mayor back a little. Throw some high, stinky cheese under his chin. Maybe even fire one behind him, get under his skin and rattle him. If he isn’t prepared to play ball, why should his opposition? He’s clearly chosen the path of divisiveness and conflict with no eye for compromise and accommodation. It’s a winner-take-all mentality, and the quicker Mayor Ford’s disabused of the notion that he’s always going to come out on top in that struggle, the sooner we can get on with the proper give and take of municipal governance.

— new yearly submitted by Cityslikr

12 thoughts on “Fight! Fight! Fight!

  1. What RF is doing differs little from what DM did with Council. Miller was given a mandate to stop a bridge, which he did after loading-up his team with sycophants.

    The media and commentators in this city need to do a better job of exposing what makes Council so dysfunctional. Harping on about “left and right”, or dwelling on the personal, isn’t getting that job done.

    Flip-floppers like Mammoliti, Minnan Wong and Stint$ deserve to be exposed so that voters know the full story. Our best hope for this Council now seems to rest with the newbies.

    • Dear Mr. MacQuarie,

      Happy New Year to you from us here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke.

      You have an open forum here. Instead of demanding ‘the media and commentators in this city to a better job of exposing what makes Council so dysfunctional’, why don’t you tell us all what exactly makes Council so dysfunctional? You’re always full of dark hints of devious machinations. Spell it out for us. Expose away.

      And responding to any criticisms we make of Rob Ford by saying David Miller did the same thing is already old. On top of which, it’s a bold faced lie. In terms of loading up his team with ‘sycophants’, do you remember Miller’s 1st budget chief? Suburban, conservative coucillor, David Soknacki. His 2nd budget chief? Suburban, centrist councillor, Shelley Carroll. That’s already two more non-sycophants than Ford’s appointed and I just started counting.

      As we’ve said to you many times before, just because you think and say it’s so, doesn’t make it true.

      • AFUITBS’s ego and vanity are telling. It seems to suffer from a histrionic personality disorder, hardly suited to an open forum at all.

        I can see that the writers for this forum are oblivious to what is wrong with our Council culture. They’re pretty thin-skinned too. My comments about Miller’s team was a reflection of the culture that needs to end but AFUITBS saw it only as a criticism of them.

        DM gave out plum jobs to those who agreed to support his agenda. I see no difference in that respect between Stintz and Carroll. The same for Soknacki and Del Grande.

        I’d suggest the writers here continue their reading.

      • Dear Mr. MacQuarie,

        Once again, a direct question was posed for you to answer (Why don’t you tell us all what exactly makes Council so dysfunctional?) and, once again, you respond with schoolyard name calling and evasive innuendo. ‘The culture that needs to end’? What culture is that exactly, and how would you propose to replace it?

        We here at all Fired Up in the Big Smoke are beginning to think that you have no answers at all. You’re just like one of those old guys sitting up in the balcony on The Muppet Show, raspberrying everything you see on stage. Would that be Statler or Waldorf?

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Fight! Fight! Fight! « All Fired Up In The Big Smoke --

  3. For me the important difference is sensible and silly. David Miller was basically sensible and gave jobs to sensible people. Ford is basically silly and has put a lot of other silly people in positions of authority.

    And it’s in none of our interests, right or left on economic issues, to have silly people running the city. That’ll cost a ton of money directly, and indirectly cause our expensive problems to fester.

  4. I told you before, I’m not here to do your bidding.

    Well cityslikr, that’s your opinion but you should be a tad more focused on Council culture and not attacking posters. You have a lot to learn now that you have mastered being a comic. (Did I not say before too that you’d be better off writing for a school magazine, or something, anything?)

    I think Howard Moscoe and Sandra Bussin were silly individuals. RF did not endorse a lot of candidates in the election so he has to work with what he was handed by the electorate. It will take him some time yet to sort out that mess they call Council.

    • Dear Mr. MacQuarie,

      Oh right. We here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke forgot. Your role is to provide all of the bitching and moaning and none of actual contributing.

      Our mistake.

      • cityslikr, it’s you who is looking for a job. I’m saying you need to work smarter. Most of what you write is a waste of good space.

        You “pinkos” really do believe only “elites” have a right to comment!

      • Dear Mr. MacQuarie,

        And yet there is nothing we here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke can write, no matter how wastefully, that will shake you from the site.

        You just can’t quit us!

  5. Nothing – so you’d better smarten-up if you don’t like me commenting.

    You might want to try to write without the ad nauseam use of irony or pop song lyrics.

    And, more of that humility.

  6. Peter, this is his space. If he doesn’t want you commenting, you won’t be commenting. You’re the one who needs to smarten up, instead of threatening your host.

Leave a Reply