When a mayoral candidate begins endorsing city council candidates, what image is it that they’re trying to project?
This is a lock, folks. I will be the next mayor and these are the councillors I want to be working with me. Help me bring a wave of change to City Hall!
But what if a mayor miscalculates in his pre-election endorsements? What if his endorsed city council candidates lose? Their victorious opponents arrive at (or return to) City Hall knowing the incoming mayor doesn’t think too much of them. It could set a rather chilly tone to the start of a working relationship.
Back in 2010, Rob Ford attempted to ride a growing tide of support as the election neared, to influence some council races, to mixed success, I’d call it. He scored Vincent Crisanti but had a series of near misses against Gloria Lindsay Luby, Peter Milczyn and Marie Augimeri. Aside from loyalty to the end from Crisanti, it’s hard to see if his choices in the other races had much affect on his working relationships with the eventual winners.
But honestly, Rob Ford may not be the best example for this, as his whole approach to governing was based on a binary, you’re for me or you’re against me dynamic. Picking sides was just how he rolled.
Maybe rather than a tactical manoeuvre, we should view mayoral campaign endorsements as a reflection of what kind of mayor we’d be getting. The council candidates a mayoral candidate endorses are the kind of councillors the would-be mayor would like to work with. They represent the ideal city council.
Last Friday mayoral frontrunner, John Tory, officially endorsed two city council candidates, Kristin Carmichael Greb in Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence and Jon Burnside, Ward 26 Don Valley West. Ward 16 is an open ward with no incumbent running. John Parker is a two-term councillor in Ward 26.
What do these endorsements say about John Tory’s opinion of city councillors he’d like to work with? According to Josh Dehaas of CTV News, “Tory responded that he did not endorse those candidates because they favour jets, but because they share his vision for the city, including his transit plan.”
“They both support SmartTrack,” Tory said, “they both support tax increases at or below inflation and they both support contracting out garbage in the east end of the city.”
Carmichael is the daughter of the local Conservative M.P. who had endorsed Tory for mayor just days earlier. Her website is chock full of conservative support and she certainly toes a very fiscally conservative (one might go as far to call it Ford-like) line.
Toronto, and in fact all governments across Canada, are facing increasing pressure on their budget due to growing costs, rising demand for its services, and waste and inefficiencies. They need to operate within their means – you cannot mortgage your kids’ future simply to get by today.
Given this fiscal reality, we need to be able to do more with less. We need to look at things like alternative models of service delivery. This could provide much needed cost savings while maintaining the quality of services we deliver.
Jon Burnside, on the other hand, is a complete cipher. I cannot get any sort of handle on his candidacy at all. I have come across many platitude and slogan filled websites during this campaign but Burnside’s ranks up there among the blandest and least consequential.
In his Accountability and Customer Service section, he pledges a 24 hour callback guarantee and monthly Town Hall meetings. Both admirable but then he states he will “Champion the needs and interests of all of our Ward 26 neighbourhoods. My interest in making a difference will be consistent, earnest and genuine.” And then, “Lead in a collaborative and co-operative way, working together with the Mayor and all Councillors to move our City forward.”
Is it just me or is that little more than space filler?
“The debate about subways versus LRTs is based on the false premise that one of these transit solutions is the best answer in all parts of Toronto,” Mr. Burnside writes. Good, good. Go on. “I support a holistic approach to transit that includes improved subway, LRT, bus and above-ground train services.”
Aside from the Fords, who doesn’t agree with that view on transit?
On and on, it continues with little more than mush in bullet points.
I will take my business experience, entrepreneurial spirit and energy to City Hall and ensure that tax dollars are spent responsibly – with a focus on delivering maximum value for every dollar.
City Hall needs Councillors with positive attitudes and an optimistic outlook; people who find solutions rather than offering excuses. I have a track record of cutting through the red tape and delivering results — results that make a difference in our community.
Out of hundreds of candidates running for city council, this is one John Tory chooses to endorse?!
Look, I endorsed other candidates in both these races. John Parker struck me as a reasonable, civil conservative councillor who stood up to bad transit decisions. City council could use a few more of those types not less. You’d think he’d align perfectly with Tory’s proclaimed moderate, centrist values.
In Ward 16, J.P. Boutros is one of my go-to, A1, top notch challengers. While it’s not surprising Tory didn’t share my views on that endorsement, given Boutros’ very strong stance against proceeding with the Scarborough subway extension, it is disturbing that, according to a media release put out by Boutros after Tory’s endorsements last week, “Tory’s announcement comes two weeks after Tory’s campaign team pledged to me that they had no intention of endorsing anyone in the Ward 16 race.”
Yeah, you know that thing we said before? Well, not so much now. No hard feelings, I hope, if it turns out we backed the wrong horse on this, yeah?
Frankly, I would’ve thought that, given the divisiveness and acrimony at city council, a mayoral hopeful might want to stay above the fray and come in to office with a clean slate. John Tory’s told us he’s a uniter. He’s all about One City.
Yet, he’s not even elected and here he goes picking sides already.
I’m beginning to suspect John Tory isn’t the kind of candidate he’s been trying to convince us he is.
— suspiciously submitted by Cityslikr
Exactly. Who has the most consistent, most observable record, the most reassuring? Not Tory.
After watching the ward debates on Rogers channel 10 I can safely say that Toronto could do a hell of a lot worse than the 2 candidates named.
I watched one debate concerned with Josh Matlow’s ward. One candidate proposed calling a public inquiry on the city planning department after firing all the planners and…..stop work on the Eglinton crosstown and fill in the hole.
Councillor Dick the Shoveller would surely be worse, no? Oh…and Burnside was endorsed by the Star today….
Doh….my mista…Star didn’t endorse Burnside. I shall take a time out and feel shame…
The Star was so inconsistent with their endorsements, not sure would want to brag, I mean pro DMW but anti Parker?
Parker’s defence of sprawl and box stores along Laird Ave, and the Slow Down program, that Parker watered down (only local streets), appear to be big reasons for the Leaside voters of the ward to want a switch. I agree that it is tough to pin him down. Reading his twitter feed he seems somewhat progressive. He supports subways, LRT, and buses in their place, instead of ideological decisions. Would he vote against Scarborough subway.. who knows. He has definitely come out against jets at Porter.
Interestingly, although he’s been strongly endorsing Tory and retweeted SmartTrack, I haven’t seen him actually specifically endorse it, although Tory says he does. Parker is not a fan of ST.
Burnside endorses the vague use of existing rails on his site. Not promising specifics (at least publicly) on citywide issues gives one a lot of flexibility, which is not always needed to win.
As for Greb & Boutros. I had always wondered why media was concentrating on two names, when my long rides through the ward showed private properties dominated by the signs of other candidates. Signs don’t always mean anything, particularly on public property or on properties that accept anybody’s signs, but these looked like supporters.
Like Boutros, the 2 leading candidates in the limited Star poll sound like they would also vote to reverse course on the Scarborough subway. Unfortunately that money might be just wasted on an Etobicoke GO subway, a Sheppard subway or some other future SmartIdea from pandering politicians.