Me And Chris Stockwell

Yesterday I wrote a post about the current plight of Detroit specifically, and of North American cities in general. chrisstockwellWithin minutes of sending out a link to the piece, I received this feedback on the Twitter from Chris Stockwell, former Progressive Conservative MPP, minister and Speaker of the Assembly under then-premiers Mike Harris and Ernie Eves:

So the Dems have won every election in Detroit for last 60 years and they go bankrupt and it is the GOP’s fault…. wow

For those of you who read the post indulge me while I point out to those who haven’t that I suggested nothing of the sort. In fact, I pretty much wrote the exact opposite. That Detroit found itself now on the verge of bankruptcy for myriad of complex reasons that stretched back over nearly 70 years. “… as with any complex situation,” to quote my exact words, georgebell“there are no easy conclusions to draw, no simple answers.”

Yet Mr. Stockwell saw that I’d mentioned three conservative politicians, his former boss at Queen’s Park, the governor of Michigan and the mayor of Toronto, and formed an opinion that I was blaming the Republican Party for Detroit’s financial problems. I responded, saying I’d also mentioned the 1987 Toronto Blue Jays in the post. Maybe they were culpable of killing Detroit too?

I mention all this not to prove how thin-skinned I am. To paraphrase our late Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau, I’ve been criticized more harshly by better people. But I do think it’s important to note because of its adverse affect on public/political/civic discourse.

We can and should have disagreements. Criticism is a necessary element to a properly functioning democracy. echochamberQuestions need to be asked. Answers given.

Opinions must be informed opinions based on all available facts at hand.

Nothing can be accomplished, however, if we’re just hurling invectives at things we imagined another person said. Reinterpreting what someone else says through a lens of personal bias just leads to a conversation with yourself. The proverbial echo chamber.

Our politics here at All Fired Up in the Big Smoke are pretty upfront. We believe that after three decades of neoliberal governance throughout this continent and much of the developed world, the chicks are coming home to roost. The results are showing up at the extremes in distressed places like Detroit and other municipalities facing insolvency but also in every city groaning under the dead weight of aging and decrepit infrastructure. becauseIsaidsoOur public realm has been starved for the sake of private interest.

In a zero sum game, more theoretical money in the taxpayers’ jeans means fewer new lines of transit. That’s just basic math.

We’re willing to be convinced otherwise but that can’t happen if you insist on debating words we didn’t write and argue with ideas we don’t have.

patiently submitted by Cityslikr

Fablication

fablication

Last week Ivor Tossell wrote about the then latest brouhaha — it was nearly 5 days ago, plenty of time for even newer brouhahas — swirling around our mayor, Rob Ford. In the article, Mr. Tossell summarized the mayor’s approach to the truth, governing and reality.

This is Rob Ford’s truth. The facts will be decided not by reality, but by the people, on election day… It’s a schoolyard view of the world, in which truth flows from popularity and power. He’s used it to run his administration like a radio phone-in show, talking to just one crowd with a mix of pandering and fabulism…

Fabulism.fablication5

What a fantastic word to describe what we’ve been living through for the past three years since Rob Ford became a serious contender for the office of mayor. Fabulism. Fabulist.

Might I offer up a new word for general usage, especially in honour Ivor Tossell’s own contribution to the political lexicon in Toronto, Uncompetence.

The word* is: Fablication.

The generation of a world where whatever you say, if you’re the right thinking kind of person, is treated as hard, cold fact. Where a statement can contradict a previous statement and both statements can still be taken seriously. Fablication creates a magical place that emphasizes simple-mindedness not simplicity. fablication2Where rigour is not de rigueur.

Rob Ford’s fantasy political world is nothing but pure fablication. In it, there are never any negative consequences to your actions. Government has a spending problem not a revenue problem, and any extra dough that might be needed to build a subway (and subways only because streetcars are the root cause of traffic congestion) will flow effusively from a potent combination of a casino and the private sector.

Who wouldn’t want to live in such a land of enchantment?

In the 2010 municipal election, 47% of Toronto voters believed such a locale actually existed. All you needed was to stop a mythical gravy train and hop aboard a boat load of respect for the taxpayer. No fuss, no bother. Only those suffering from an engorged sense of entitlement and just the mildest sense of irony would feel any pain. fablication1Those symptoms largely inflicted denizens living in the old city of Toronto and in East York.

Even today, a solid chunk of those supporters continue to clap their hands in the hopes of keeping that dream alive, encouraging Mayor Ford to further dig in his heels. And he does. As Metrolinx ratchets up the real world conversation about viable revenue options to fund a long overdue transit expansion and the city’s chief planner chairs a roundtable, the Next Generation Suburbs, the mayor talks about graffiti and fake vomits (with accompanying video track) at the idea of new taxes and tolls.

Surely we can build more transit by cutting further finding efficiencies, rolling back public sector wages and benefits, stopping boondoggles. Where the hell do all the gas taxes go? asks a former PC MPP, apparently with a straight face. Stop demanding money, folks. We can just fablicate new transit.

Fablication built Ford Nation.

Listen to it in action every Sunday between 1 and 3 p.m. on 1010 Talk Radio. fablication4Or, for a quick hit, read David Hains’ synopsis of the show. (Check out 2:32 in Monday’s post for what I’m talking about when I talk about fablication.)

While the mayor is a very good practitioner of fablication, his brother is a master.

Witness Councillor Ford’s performance last week at Ryerson’s inappropriately named Law, Business, Politics – The Real World class. (Don’t know if it’s just my internet connection but the video is very, very choppy.) It was an hour and a half of outright fablication, punctuated by moments of actual serious discussion from co-panellist, Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam.

You see, the duly elected councillor is not a politician. He’s a businessman. He and his brother-mayor (elected with the largest mandate in Canadian history [≈ 1’10”] and the most accessible politician in the country, in North America who fields 80-90 phone calls a day and doesn’t spend his time behind a big desk, talking to bureaucrats [≈ 54.30”]) have already saved the taxpayers of Toronto a billion dollars [≈ 57.30”]. fablication3When the councillor hosts visitors to the city, he’s always having to answer the same question. “What is there to do in Toronto, Doug?” [1’1”]. So that’s why we need to build a casino because, while the councillor doesn’t want to throw around wild numbers, he will anyway. Build a casino on city owned property and that’s $30 million in tax revenues, plus $30 million in a land lease agreement and we’re only getting started. Which is why we don’t taxes to build subways, folks. Casino revenue and the private sector who will tunnel across the city for us [1’17”]. apparently, in order to help alleviate our congestion woes.

And on and on it goes in the view of a fablicuist. (Trying on new words to see how they fit). Strawberry fields for-ever.

Why make up a word when there’s already one that might fit the bill? Fabulism. Fabulist. Fabler.

In the traditional definition, fables are supposed to have a meaning, an ‘edifying or cautionary point’. There’s nothing edifying or cautionary in fablication. Fablication is all about self-interest. fablication6Opinion, especially of the uniformed type, passes for truth. Facts are figments of a fablicateur’s imagination. Anything goes, in the world of fablication. Up is down. Black is white. Everything’s relative. The truth is somewhere in the middle. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.

Fablication is the tool used by those on the wrong side of every issue. It is the creation of a reality unencumbered by the necessity to adhere to any notion of the truth. It’s undemanding, free-floating, amorphous and subject to change at a moment’s notice. Eventually a fablicated world will collapse into itself, but the key for everyone living outside its bubble is to limit the damage inflicted before it does.

* as far as I know ‘fablication’ was first coined by Catherine Soplet

studiously submitted by Cityslikr